Zitenchandradas

USA Hot new

White House Claims Deportation Flights Complied with Judge’s Order

Go to link click details

Tornado Threat Shifts South After Severe Storms Leave at Least 34 Dead

Tornado Threat Shifts South After Severe Storms Leave at Least 34 Dead

Severe storms have killed at least 34 people as the tornado threat moves south, endangering millions. Officials warn of high winds, flash floods, and more tornadoes as rescue efforts continue.

Trump Invokes Wartime Act, Orders Deportation of Suspected Venezuelan Gang Members

Trump Invokes Wartime Act, Orders Deportation of Suspected Venezuelan Gang Members

President Trump has invoked a wartime-era law to expedite the deportation of suspected Venezuelan gang members, citing national security concerns. The move comes amid rising tensions over crime and immigration policy, sparking debate over its legal and humanitarian implications.

**Off the Grid: Sally Unpacks USA TODAY’s Daily Crossword, *Picture Frames***

Off the Grid: Sally Unpacks USA TODAY’s Daily Crossword, Picture Frames

Today's Crossword Takeaway

TOMEI (31D: "In the Bedroom" actress Marisa) – In the Bedroom is a 2001 film based on Andre Dubus' 1979 short story Killings. The movie stars Marisa TOMEI alongside Sissy Spacek, Tom Wilkinson, Nick Stahl, and William Mapother, exploring complex family dynamics.

The title refers to the rear compartment of a lobster trap, known as the "bedroom." This section can hold only two lobsters—any more, and they will turn on each other, a metaphor for the film’s central themes.

AG Pam Bondi vowed to depoliticize the Justice Department—has she done the opposite?

AG Pam Bondi Promised to Depoliticize the Justice Department—Has She Done the Opposite?

By Josh Meyer and Bart Jansen, USA TODAY

WASHINGTON – During her Senate confirmation hearing, Attorney General Pam Bondi vowed to remove politics from the Justice Department, ensuring that federal law enforcement investigations and prosecutions would remain impartial and independent.

Sitting before the Senate Judiciary Committee on January 15, Bondi repeatedly insisted that under her leadership, the Justice Department would “only follow the facts and the law.” She assured lawmakers that neither the White House nor President Donald Trump—who had signaled a desire for retribution—would improperly influence the department’s decisions.

Bondi also committed to supporting frontline prosecutors and federal agents from agencies like the FBI and DEA while promising to remove only those she deemed “bad.”

Has she lived up to that promise, or has the Justice Department become more politicized under her tenure?

EU unveils €26 billion in retaliatory measures against Trump's steel tariffs.

See details

EU Announces €26 Billion in Retaliatory Tariffs Against U.S. Steel Duties

LONDON – The European Union announced Wednesday that it would impose countermeasures on approximately €26 billion ($28 billion) worth of U.S. goods in response to the Trump administration's steel tariffs.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need to protect consumers and businesses, stating, "Tariffs are taxes. They are bad for business and even worse for consumers. These tariffs disrupt supply chains, create economic uncertainty, and put jobs at risk. Prices will rise both in Europe and the United States."

The EU's countermeasures are designed to mirror the economic impact of the U.S. tariffs and are set to take effect starting April 1, with full implementation by April 13, according to the commission.

"We remain open to negotiation," von der Leyen added.

This story is developing. Check back for updates.

Trump Backs Down on Additional 25% Tariff on Canadian Steel and Aluminum

Trump Backs Down on Additional 25% Tariff on Canadian Steel and Aluminum

Trump Backs Down on Additional 25% Tariff on Canadian Steel and Aluminum Amid Trade Tensions

By Michelle Stoddart and Max Zahn
March 12, 2025, 3:51 AM

President Donald Trump on Tuesday reversed course on his plan to impose an additional 25% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum products, which would have been on top of an existing 25% tariff set to take effect Wednesday.

The decision followed an agreement between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to suspend a planned 25% surcharge on electricity exports from Ontario to the U.S. Ford had previously threatened the surcharge in retaliation for Trump’s tariff increase.

In a joint statement on X, Ford and Lutnick announced the suspension of the electricity surcharge and confirmed a White House meeting on Thursday to discuss a potential renewal of the U.S.-Canada trade agreement.

Tensions Leading to Reversal

Trump’s initial announcement of doubling tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum came after Ford’s warning about the electricity surcharge. While the additional tariff increase has been halted, the original 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from all countries—including Canada—will still take effect on Wednesday, according to White House spokesman Kush Desai.

The U.S. imports more steel and aluminum from Canada than any other country, making the tariffs a significant economic flashpoint.

Escalating Trade War

The developments marked a brief pause in an escalating trade war between the two countries. After the U.S. initially imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, Canada retaliated with its own 25% tariff on $30 billion worth of U.S. goods. An additional $125 billion in Canadian tariffs is set to take effect in 21 days, according to then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Trudeau sharply criticized Trump’s trade policies, calling the tariffs "dumb" and arguing they "don’t make sense."

Ford and Trump’s Tough Talk

Even before the apparent deal, both Ford and Trump took a hardline stance on trade.

"That's the last thing I want to do," Ford told CNBC regarding the electricity surcharge. "I want to send more electricity down to the U.S., to our closest allies. But if [Trump] continues to hurt Canadian families, Ontario families, I won’t hesitate to act."

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Canada’s incoming Prime Minister Mark Carney described Trump’s tariffs as an "attack on Canadian workers, families, and businesses." The spokesperson added that Canada would maintain its retaliatory tariffs until the U.S. demonstrates "respect and credible, reliable commitments to free and fair trade."

White House Response

Speaking at the White House on Tuesday, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that Trump had not yet spoken with Carney since he was designated prime minister on Sunday but said, "Certainly, [Trump's] phone is always open to leaders who want to speak with him."

While tensions have eased slightly with the latest agreement, the future of U.S.-Canada trade relations remains uncertain.

Trump Reverses Course on Additional 25% Tariff on Canadian Steel and Aluminum Amid Trade War Escalation

By Michelle Stoddart and Max Zahn
March 12, 2025, 3:51 AM

President Donald Trump on Tuesday backed down from his plan to impose an additional 25% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum products, which would have come on top of an existing 25% tariff set to take effect Wednesday.

The reversal followed an agreement between Ontario Premier Doug Ford and U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick to suspend a planned 25% surcharge on Ontario electricity exports to the U.S. Ford had threatened the surcharge in retaliation for Trump’s proposed tariff increase.

In a joint statement on X, Ford and Lutnick confirmed the suspension of the electricity surcharge and announced a White House meeting on Thursday to discuss a potential renewal of the U.S.-Canada trade agreement.

Trade War Tensions Escalate

While Trump’s decision marks a temporary de-escalation, the original 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from all countries—including Canada—will still take effect on Wednesday, according to White House spokesman Kush Desai. The U.S. imports more steel and aluminum from Canada than any other country, making the tariffs a major economic flashpoint.

Canada had responded swiftly to the U.S. tariffs, imposing 25% retaliatory tariffs on $30 billion worth of American goods. Then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau warned that an additional $125 billion in Canadian tariffs would follow in 21 days if the dispute remained unresolved.

Trudeau blasted Trump’s tariff policies, calling them “dumb” and arguing they “don’t make sense.”

Ford and Trump’s Heated Rhetoric

Before the apparent deal, both Ford and Trump struck a defiant tone.

"That's the last thing I want to do," Ford told CNBC, referring to the electricity surcharge. "But as [Trump] continues to hurt Canadian families, Ontario families, I won’t hesitate to act."

Earlier, Canada’s incoming Prime Minister Mark Carney called Trump’s tariffs an "attack on Canadian workers, families, and businesses." He vowed to maintain Canada’s retaliatory tariffs until the U.S. showed "respect and credible, reliable commitments to free and fair trade."

At the White House, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that Trump had not yet spoken with Carney since his designation as prime minister. Asked whether the U.S. still considers Canada an ally, she responded, "They have always been an ally. Perhaps they’ve become a competitor now."

Trump Threatens Further Action

Despite the agreement, Trump signaled that tensions are far from over.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump warned that if Canada did not drop its existing tariffs, he would increase tariffs on Canadian auto imports starting April 2, a move he claimed would “essentially, permanently shut down” Canada’s automobile manufacturing sector.

Trump also demanded Canada remove tariffs on American dairy products and revived his controversial assertion that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state.

"The artificial line of separation drawn many years ago will finally disappear," Trump wrote. "Your brilliant anthem, ‘O Canada,’ will continue to play, but now representing a GREAT and POWERFUL STATE within the greatest Nation that the World has ever seen!"

Meanwhile, Ford urged Trump to reconsider his tariffs, warning of economic turmoil.

"Markets are tanking. He needs to drop his tariffs and come to the table to negotiate a fair trade deal. Until he does, we won’t back down," Ford wrote in a post on X.

Fentanyl Allegations and the Root of the Trade Dispute

The revived trade war follows Trump’s claims that Canada has failed to stop illicit drugs like fentanyl from entering the U.S., despite a prior agreement between the two nations to strengthen border enforcement.

However, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol data shows that nearly all fentanyl seizures have occurred at the U.S.-Mexico border, with less than 1% intercepted at the Canadian border. Trudeau dismissed Trump’s claims as "false allegations" meant to justify the tariffs.

Despite Tuesday’s reversal, Trump’s latest threats suggest the U.S.-Canada trade dispute is far from over.

Federal employees told to justify jobs in email or Musk says they face dismissal

Trump and Musk Demand Federal Workers Justify Their Jobs in Surprise Email

By Shania Shelton, Tami Luhby, Josh Campbell, Eva McKend, and Evan Perez | CNN

Updated: 12:05 AM EST, Sun February 23, 2025

In a sudden and controversial move, federal employees received emails Saturday demanding they outline their work from the past week—part of a joint effort by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk to scrutinize the federal workforce. Musk warned that “failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”

The emails, sent from a new Office of Personnel Management address, lacked official signatures and instructed recipients to provide five bullet points summarizing their accomplishments. However, national security agencies, including the FBI, advised employees not to respond immediately, signaling internal uncertainty about the directive.

Musk’s announcement on X followed Trump’s call for more “aggressive” action, raising concerns about the administration’s transparency and coordination. While the emails did not explicitly state that non-compliance would lead to termination, they set a deadline of Monday at 11:59 p.m. ET, leaving federal workers uncertain about their job security.

Today's USA breaking news

Today USA breaking news

Hostages released by hamas reunite with their families

Hostages released by Hamas reunite with their families, embracing after weeks of captivity in an emotional and long-awaited moment of relief and joy.

Update 12 news

Inside the 48 Hours When Trump Turned on Zelensky

Inside the 48 Hours When Trump Turned Against Zelensky

By Kevin Liptak, Jeff Zeleny, and Alayna Treene, CNN

Published: 12:00 AM EST, Thu February 20, 2025

In a dramatic escalation of tensions, former President Donald Trump launched a series of public attacks against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, raising questions about the future of U.S. support for Ukraine and the potential impact on peace negotiations.

Trump accused Zelensky of being a “dictator without elections” and blamed him for pressuring the U.S. into spending billions on an “unwinnable war.” These remarks, delivered through Trump’s social media platform and later echoed in a speech in Miami, mirrored Kremlin rhetoric and marked a sharp shift in his stance toward Ukraine’s leadership.

For years, Trump had been skeptical of Zelensky, dating back to his first impeachment over pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden. However, his latest remarks signaled a deeper rupture, especially as his aides closely monitored Zelensky’s criticism of the U.S. for excluding Ukraine from recent negotiations with Russian officials.

Zelensky, for his part, dismissed Trump’s accusations, stating that the former president was operating in a “web of disinformation.” The exchange intensified speculation over Trump’s foreign policy approach, particularly as he prepares for potential direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Saudi Arabia.

While some Trump allies suggested his comments were part of a broader strategy to pressure European nations into increasing their support for Ukraine, others worried that his rhetoric could embolden Russia and weaken Western unity. Meanwhile, European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, reaffirmed their support for Zelensky and Ukraine’s sovereignty.

As Trump positions himself as a peacemaker, the question remains: Will his confrontational stance push Ukraine toward a settlement, or will it further fracture alliances and strengthen Moscow’s hand?

Judge Rules Trump’s Plan to Encourage Federal Worker Resignations Can Proceed

udge Rules Trump’s Plan to Encourage Federal Worker Resignations Can Proceed

A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump’s broad initiative to persuade federal employees to resign can move forward, delivering a legal win for the administration’s efforts to shrink the federal workforce.

The ruling clears the way for the White House to implement policies aimed at encouraging voluntary departures, a key component of Trump’s broader strategy to reduce government size and streamline operations.

Opponents of the plan, including labor unions and Democratic-led states, had challenged the initiative, arguing it could undermine critical government functions and coerce employees into leaving. However, the judge found that the administration has the legal authority to pursue voluntary attrition policies.

The decision is expected to fuel further legal and political battles as the administration moves ahead with its federal workforce overhaul.

Judge Lifts Freeze on Trump Administration’s Federal Worker Buyout Program

A federal judge in Boston on Wednesday lifted a temporary block on the Trump administration’s unprecedented offer for millions of federal employees to resign, allowing the controversial “fork in the road” program to move forward.

U.S. District Judge George A. O’Toole Jr. had initially halted the mass buyout initiative last week, just hours before the Thursday deadline for workers to accept the offer. The pause came after labor unions sued, arguing that the administration lacked legal authority to implement such sweeping resignations.

However, in his ruling Wednesday, O’Toole determined that the unions did not have legal standing to challenge the policy.The plaintiffs here are not directly impacted by the directive,” O’Toole wrote, explaining that the unions were citing indirect effects, such as resource diversion, potential membership losses, and reputational concerns—which he found insufficient to justify their lawsuit.

With the ruling, the Trump administration’s efforts to reshape the federal workforce through voluntary buyouts can now proceed.

Digital Marketer